You want to avoid a risk by a side effect of the anticancer agent or the surgery treatment, and there may not be it by the exaggeration even if it is said that it is necessary to be going to get over with a health food.
If the uterine cancer wants to be treated with a health food, it is necessary you understand a pit because of the health food, and to put it.
But it is that the effect is not proved first to be careful because a health food is not a medicine.
The health food is based on the present conditions that the article has the gap of the good or bad to work all of you, and * ku ji is important, and a supplier selling an inferior thing is seen in the article a lot to pursue merely profit.
Because a health food is not a medicine, sale is possible freely, but there is the examination as the one of the simple food in a meaning in there not being the examination at all.
In other words that you are effective for treatment of the cancer including uterine cancer is that it is entrusted the selfish judgment of the distributor.
You may reduce an irresponsible distributor if you grind a health food with a medicine equally, but if it is so, you will confirm an effect by clinical experiment, and a large amount of expense and time are necessary, and it is wrong that a price becomes considerably expensive while being a health food, and there is not it.
Furthermore, the thing which you do not have of proof and the analysis is prohibited from sale by a chemical analysis, and, as for the thing that there is the origin in folklore and Oriental medicine, acquisition becomes impossible.
Even if it takes the health food and was effective against uterine cancer, there is the individual difference, and proof is that it is difficult whether a health food really works, and there was an effect for cancer.
